바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Affordable method of video recording for ecologists and citizen-science participants

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2018, v.42 no.2, pp.85-89
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-018-0070-7







Piotr G. Jablonski
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Observations and video documentation of interactions between animals living in dens, cavities, and other enclosed spaces are difficult, but they play an important role in field biology, ecology, and conservation. For example, bird parents visiting nests and feeding their nestlings may provide crucial information for testing of ecological hypotheses and may easily attract attention of participants of citizen-science ecological and conservation projects. Because of the nest concealment of cavity-nesting birds, their behaviors in the nest can only be studied by using video surveillance. Professional wildlife surveillance systems are extremely expensive. Here, we describe an inexpensive video setup that can be constructed with relatively little effort and is more affordable than any previously described system. We anticipate that the relatively low cost of about 250 USD for a battery-operated system is an important feature for citizen-science type of projects and for applications in heavily populated areas where the potential for theft and vandalism may be high. Based on our experiences, we provide methodological advice on practical aspects of using this system in the field for ecological research on birds. We highlight the low cost, easiness of construction, and potential availability to a large number of observers taking part in wildlife monitoring projects, and we offer technical help to participants of such research projects.

keywords
Video surveillance, DVR, Nest box, Method, Nest monitoring, Varied tit, Sittiparus varius

Reference

1.

Cox, W. A., Pruett, M. S., Benson, T. J., Chavacci, S. J., & Thompson III, F. R. (2012). Development of camera technology for monitoring nests. In C. A. Ribic et al. (Eds.), Video surveillance of nesting birds. Studies in avian biology (no. 43) (pp. 185-210). Berkeley: University of California Press.

2.

Hinde, C. A. (2006). Negotiation over offspring care?-a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 6-12.

3.

Houston, A. I., Szekely, T., & McNamara, J. M. (2013). The parental investment models of Maynard Smith: a retrospective and prospective view. Animal Behavior, 86, 667-674.

4.

O'Brien, T. G., & Kinnaird, M. F. (2008). A picture is worth a thousand words: the application of camera trapping to the study of birds. Bird Conservation International, 18, S144-S162.

5.

Park, C. R., Yang, H. M., Oh, J. H., & Kang, I. (2012). Development of "nest finder system" and its application in forest ecosystems. Korean Journal of Nature Conservation, 6, 27-32.

6.

Pierce, A. J., & Pobprasert, K. (2007). A portable system for continuous monitoring of bird nests using digital video recorders. Journal of Field Ornithology, 78, 322-328.

7.

Sabine, J. B., Meyers, J. M., & Schweitzer, S. H. (2005). A simple, inexpensive video camera setup for the study of avian nest activity. Journal of Field Ornithology, 76, 293-297.

8.

Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 467-471.

9.

Sullivan, B. L., Wood, C. L., Marshall, J. I., Bonney, R. E., Fink, D., & Kelling, S. (2009). eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142, 2282-2292.

Journal of Ecology and Environment